The Hidden Cost of Reactive Maintenance
The real cost of reactive maintenance isn’t always visible on a report. This piece looks at how it quietly affects planning, decision-making, and business risk.
Casey Lehman
12/15/20252 min read


Most executives don’t choose to run reactive maintenance organizations.
The intent is usually clear: plan the work, improve reliability, reduce risk. But over time, urgency takes over. Breakdowns stack up, priorities shift, and before anyone says it out loud, the organization is operating reactively.
The real cost isn’t just the repair.
What Shows Up in the Numbers
Reactive maintenance is easy to see on a report. Overtime rises. Contractors are rushed in. Parts are expedited or overstocked “just in case.” Planned work gets pushed, only to return later as a larger, more expensive failure.
These costs are familiar—and often accepted as part of doing business.
What Leaders Feel Instead
The harder cost is less visible. Plans lose credibility. Schedules slip. Teams stop trusting forecasts. Leaders spend more time managing surprises than improving performance.
Instead of asking how to prevent failures, the focus becomes how to get through the week.
Why It Becomes the Default
Reactive work wins attention. Preventive work is invisible when it’s done well. Without strong planning discipline and operating cadence, firefighting slowly becomes the norm—not because people aren’t capable, but because the system rewards urgency.
Inventory Tells the Story
Spare-parts inventory quietly reflects this reality. Critical parts are missing when needed. Low-risk parts accumulate. Capital gets tied up without reducing risk.
It’s not an inventory problem—it’s a reliability one.
When It Reaches the Executive Level
Reactive maintenance eventually becomes a leadership issue because it affects commitments. Missed production targets, deferred capital plans, unplanned outages. At that point, reliability stops being a maintenance concern and becomes a business risk.
The Real Shift
The goal isn’t zero reactive work—that’s unrealistic. The goal is reducing avoidable reactivity by strengthening planning, data trust, ownership, and cadence.
When those elements are in place, reactive work shrinks naturally—and when it does happen, it’s far less disruptive.
Final Thought
Reactive maintenance doesn’t just cost money. It costs confidence—in plans, in data, and in predictability.
Executives feel that cost long before it shows up in a report. Addressing it starts with how reliability is managed, reviewed, and reinforced across the organization.
